Which of the following is NOT a type of reliability mentioned?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for ASU's PSY366 Abnormal Psychology Exam. Study with engaging flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Boost your readiness for success!

Construct reliability is not recognized as a formal type of reliability in psychological testing. The main types of reliability focus on different aspects of measurement consistency. For instance, interrater reliability assesses the degree to which different observers or raters give consistent estimates of the same phenomenon. Test-retest reliability evaluates the stability of test scores over time, ensuring that an assessment yields consistent results when administered on different occasions. Alternate form reliability examines the consistency of scores obtained with different versions of the same test, ensuring that variations do not affect results. By contrast, "construct reliability" is not commonly used in the same manner; instead, concepts relating to construct validity are discussed, which focus on whether a test truly measures the theoretical construct it intends to measure. Hence, saying that construct reliability is not a recognized type of reliability aligns with established psychological testing paradigms.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy