Pseudoscience is characterized by what key feature?

Pseudoscience is characterized by a resistance to evaluation by other experts, which distinguishes it from legitimate scientific inquiry. This resistance manifests as a reluctance to submit to peer review, scrutiny, and critical examination by the scientific community. Unlike science, which thrives on challenges, revisions, and evidence-based validation, pseudoscientific claims often ignore or dismiss adverse evidence and critique.

For example, proponents of pseudoscientific theories may avoid engaging in open discussions with skeptics or re-evaluating their claims in light of new evidence. This lack of openness undermines the credibility of their assertions and prevents the advancement of knowledge based on rigorous standards of evidence and methodology.